Fusion-io's technology combination of advanced bit error correction, proactive monitoring of stored data and a new chip dedicated to taking over for a failed one creates a "self-healing" system that can quickly restore, correct and resurrect lost information, the company said. In June, Hewlett-Packard Co. While the companies didn't announce a timeline, Fusion-io's ioMemory architecture is expected to be in HP enterprise servers, including the industry-leading HP BladeSystem c-Class system, shipping in Here are the latest Insider stories.
Though its save write and merge read and write figures were comparable, its journal write marks were higher for the bulk of the test. This test measures average TPS Transactions Per Second , average latency, as well as average 99th percentile latency over a range of 2 to 32 threads. Percona and MariaDB are using the Fusion-io flash-aware application APIs in the most recent releases of their databases, although for the purposes of this comparison we test each device in their "legacy" block-storage modes.
In our SysBench tests, the Fusion-io ioDrive2 1. Average latency from the Fusion-io ioDrive2 1. Comparing 99th percentile latency in our SysBench test, the Fusion-io ioDrive2 1. Flash performance varies throughout the preconditioning phase of each storage device. Our synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process begins with an analysis of the way the drive performs during a thorough preconditioning phase. Our Enterprise Synthetic Workload Analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks.
Additionally, with the ioDrive2, we utilized its overprovisioning capability for a high performance HP testing mode. Bursting HP figures were similar to bursting stock figures. Stock numbers were similar in burst, but higher in steady-state, getting edged out again by the Intel SSD Additionally, its Windows HP Max latency was far behind the competition.
Looking even closer at latency consistency in our 4k random write workload, the Fusion-io ioDrive2 Linux and Windows HP both placed just behind the Intel SSD which scored the top marks with 2. The Intel SSD delivered greater write throughput. Max latency from the Fusion-io ioDrive2 Windows stock was the best for read activity at just 7.
Comparing latency consistency, the Fusion-io ioDrive2 MLC posted figures near the back of the group in 4k random read and write consistency. Sign in. Forgot your password? Get help. Privacy Policy. Password recovery.
Fusion-io ioDrive Duo. Linux, Proxmox, Ubuntu and Fusion-io ioDrive cards — important notes. Please enter your comment! Please enter your name here. We tested the card for longer than seconds.
After 48 hours with our stress test under SQL server the write latency was poor. We talked to the support team and still poor write performance over time.
It just got to the point where I knew exactly which second test would break the card. Good luck with it, though — let me know how that approach works out for you.
I just threw a ocz revo in a clients server with spectacular results dropped from 40ms avg wait times to 0. Do you think block-level replication between like DRBD physically discreet servers would be viable? Each having 10GoE and an ioDrive? I can imagine this constellation of technology providing a relatively inexpensive yet redundant and fast system. Reads would, in theory, be just as quick…but writes?
Is there not a similar block-level replication technology for MS platforms? I would not know. At least with the way I have DRBD configured, the write call does not return until the second machine completes the write. Hence my mention of the slower writes above. How many fusion IO drives do you need to get maximal performance and redundancy on ans sql r2 sp1 with synchronise replication to a secondary server.
And do I install the whole SQL database and binaries on the fusion IO and how do I split tempdb, logs, data when I have a san and some fusion io cards. Are there some white paers on installing an SQL server on this type of cards? Hi, Koen. My colleague states its not an issue due to more discs involved in striping and they have tested. For example, a quick Google pulls up this result in their forums:. Great write up! Any particular consumer-side config to make the Fusion-io card perform well?
And, similar to your tests… it took weeks to figure that out. For the workloads I work with, using the onboard flash to create a write-through or write-around, or tier 0 depending on vendor terms and implementation cache in the server can dramatically increase total throughput as well as driving latency down.
After saturating fibre channel at 1. Putting tempdb on the card was good for us because we wanted not to send large amounts of query spill to the SAN. Hi, Lonny. Thanks, glad you liked the post. Consider writing your own post to share your experiences — this type of post is usually very popular with readers. Your email address will not be published. Don't subscribe All Replies to my comments Notify me of followup comments via e-mail.
You can also subscribe without commenting. Post Comment. Want to advertise here and reach my savvy readers? Leave new Wes Brown.
0コメント